Description

Signicat is Europe's leading provider of digital identity solutions. Our mission is to enable trust in the digital world by providing secure, seamless, and compliant identity solutions. We empower businesses and individuals to verify, authenticate, and manage identities with confidenceā€”ensuring trust at every step of the customer journey, from onboarding to offboarding.

Bounties

This is a responsible disclosure program without bounties.

Rules of engagement
Required
Not applicable
max. 5 requests /sec
X-Bug-Bounty: <username>

By participating in this program, you agree to:

  • Respect the Community Code of Conduct
  • Respect the Intigriti Terms and Conditions
  • Respect the scope of the program
  • Not discuss or disclose vulnerability information without prior written consent (including PoC's on YouTube and Vimeo)
Domains

Dokobit

No bounty
Other

Any domains or services related to Dokobit by Signicat as a brand

Signicat

No bounty
Other

Any domains or services related to Signicat as a brand

In scope

This Responsible Disclosure Program covers all Signicat services, products, and web properties managed by Signicat Group and its subsidiaries, including Dokobit, Symphonic Solutions (Sphonic), Connectis, and Signicat Spain (formerly ElectronicID).

While this program does not offer direct monetary rewards, researchers who report previously unknown vulnerabilities that lead to a code or configuration change may be invited to our invite-only bug bounty program, where they can receive both recognition and financial bounties for further contributions.

Out of scope

Application

  • Wordpress usernames disclosure
  • Pre-Auth Account takeover/OAuth squatting
  • Self-XSS that can't be used to exploit other users
  • Verbose messages/files/directory listings without disclosing any sensitive information
  • CORS misconfiguration on non-sensitive endpoints
  • Missing cookie flags
  • Missing security headers
  • Cross-site Request Forgery with no or low impact
  • Presence of autocomplete attribute on web forms
  • Reverse tabnabbing
  • Bypassing rate-limits or the non-existence of rate-limits.
  • Best practices violations (password complexity, expiration, re-use, etc.)
  • Clickjacking without proven impact/unrealistic user interaction
  • CSV Injection
  • Sessions not being invalidated (logout, enabling 2FA, etc.)
  • Tokens leaked to third parties
  • Anything related to email spoofing, SPF, DMARC or DKIM
  • Content injection without being able to modify the HTML
  • Username/email enumeration
  • Email bombing
  • HTTP Request smuggling without any proven impact
  • Homograph attacks
  • XMLRPC enabled
  • Banner grabbing/Version disclosure
  • Not stripping metadata of files
  • Same-site scripting
  • Subdomain takeover without taking over the subdomain
  • Arbitrary file upload without proof of the existence of the uploaded file
  • Blind SSRF without proven business impact (pingbacks aren't sufficient)
  • Disclosed/misconfigured Google Maps API keys
  • Host header injection without proven business impact

General

  • In case that a reported vulnerability was already known to the company from their own tests, it will be flagged as a duplicate
  • Theoretical security issues with no realistic exploit scenario(s) or attack surfaces, or issues that would require complex end user interactions to be exploited
  • Spam, social engineering and physical intrusion
  • DoS/DDoS attacks or brute force attacks
  • Vulnerabilities that only work on software that no longer receive security updates
  • Attacks requiring physical access to a victim's computer/device, man in the middle or compromised user accounts
  • Recently discovered zero-day vulnerabilities found in in-scope assets within 14 days after the public release of a patch or mitigation may be reported, but are usually not eligible for a bounty
  • Reports that state that software is out of date/vulnerable without a proof-of-concept

Mobile

  • Shared links leaked through the system clipboard
  • Any URIs leaked because a malicious app has permission to view URIs opened
  • The absence of certificate pinning
  • Sensitive data in URLs/request bodies when protected by TLS
  • Lack of obfuscation
  • Path disclosure in the binary
  • Lack of jailbreak & root detection
  • Crashes due to malformed URL Schemes
  • Lack of binary protection (anti-debugging) controls, mobile SSL pinning
  • Snapshot/Pasteboard leakage
  • Runtime hacking exploits (exploits only possible in a jailbroken environment)
  • API key leakage used for insensitive activities/actions
Severity assessment

This program follows Intigriti's contextual CVSS standard

FAQ

Where can we get credentials for the app?

You can self-register on the application but please always use your @intigriti.me address.

All aboard!
Please log in or sign up on the platform

For obvious reasons we can only allow submissions or applications for our program with a valid Intigriti account.

It will only take 2 minutes to create a new one or even less to log in with an existing account, so don't hesitate and let's get started. We would be thrilled to have you as part of our community.

Program specifics
No collaboration
Researchers
last contributors
Overall stats
submissions received
3
average payout
N/A
accepted submissions
N/A
total payouts
N/A
Last 90 day response times
avg. time first response
< 16 hours
avg. time to decide
< 3 days
avg. time to triage
< 2 days
Activity
3/13
Signicat AS
closed a submission
3/12
logo
redwanur_1
created a submission
3/3
Signicat AS
closed a submission
2/27
Signicat AS
closed a submission
2/27
logo
giongfnef26
created a submission
2/26
logo
veak
created a submission
2/26
Signicat AS updated the confidentiality level to public
2/26
Signicat AS updated the confidentiality level to registered
2/26
Signicat AS updated the confidentiality level to application
2/26
Signicat Responsible Disclosure
launched